Whenever I engage folks back home in the states in discussion about the Israeli occupation of Palestine, the word ‘balance’ always seems to come into the conversation. “The conflict is complicated,” folks say, “we’re not experts so we should be balanced in our approach.” Today as I experienced the abandoned central streets and massive military presence in Hebron that Israeli settlers have termed ‘liberation,” today as I heard the story of Palestinian villagers in the South Hebron hills having their bread oven, their main source food being destroyed by settlers again and again despite multiple Supreme Court rulings to the contrary, today as I heard a former IDF soldier breaking the silence about how military strategy is regularly break into random homes and detain Palestinians for up to 90 days without giving them access to a lawyer in order to “make their presence felt,” I can’t but cry out in anguish about what “balance” could possibly look like in such a dire situation.
Can one achieve balance in the collection of information, engaging all sides and narratives in assessing a situation? Yes, absolutely. A balanced assessment is the only way to credibly engage in advocacy. Yet at some point, balance becomes at best a hindrance and at worst an excuse for inaction. In the face of such a starkly clear situation of overwhelming oppression of the Palestinian people, to be “balanced” in one’s prophetic proclamation and to neglect radical non-violent action simply proves unethical. I am not Pro-Palestinian. I am not pro-Israeli. But as a person of faith, as a Christian, I am pro-peace, I am pro-justice and I am pro-recognizing the face of Christ in all those crushed by overwhelming oppression. Perhaps there is a type of balance in that. But to be balanced or moderate in proclaiming that God’s heart is breaking under this brutal occupation as my heart breaks as well? No, that is not possible.